Skip to content


Corporate Transparency Act Held Unconstitutional


The Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) requires each person to disclose to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCen”), acting on behalf of the United States Treasury Department, the beneficial owner and applicant for each entity to be formed by a filing with a state or an Indian tribe as well as for each foreign entity seeking to register to do business in the jurisdiction.  Although the Justice Department argued the legislature has the power to require disclosure under the powers delegated to it by the commerce clause and taxing authority, on March 1, 2024, Federal District Judge Liles C. Burke expressed his disagreement by declaring the law unconstitutional.  

The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution makes it clear that the federal government can only operate under the powers delegated to it.  Judge Burke pointed out that the founders discussed the idea of moving the power of incorporation to the federal government and decided against it. Further, the Judge opined that the act of forming a corporation was not the same as engaging in interstate or foreign commerce.  Many corporations are formed for non-commercial purposes or intra state operations 

The Court opined, “Because the CTA does not regulate commerce on its face, contain a jurisdictional hook, or serve as an essential part of a comprehensive regulatory scheme, it falls outside of Congress’ power to regulate non-commercial, intrastate activities.” 

The Court also rejected the Government’s argument that congress had the power to enact this law under its taxing authority.  Except for penalties for failure to comply, the statute is not revenue producing.  The fact that FinCen could use the information to search for untaxed amounts is too tenuous a connection the government’s taxing authority. 

In the end, Judge Burke granted summary judgment striking the CTA as unconstitutional because it cannot be “justified as an exercise of Congress’ enumerated powers.”  National Small Business United v Yellen. Case NO. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB.  US District Court. Northern District of Alabama. Northeastern Division.

 1. Keven Danow is an attorney representing members of all three tiers of the Beverage Alcohol Industry and member of the firm of Danow, McMullan & Panoff, P.C. 275 Madison Ave, NY, NY. 10022.  (212 3703744). Website:; email: This article is not intended to give specific legal advice. Before taking any action, the reader should consult with an attorney familiar with the relevant facts and circumstances.

This article is not intended to give specific legal advice.  Before taking any action, the reader should consult with an attorney familiar with the relevant facts and circumstances.

Written by

Keven Danow

Founding and Senior Partner
Read bio

Categorized in

Latest News

Stay informed on the critical current issues impacting the beverage alcohol industry

Wine and Spirits Labeled as Organic

Because a growing number of consumers believe there is an advantage to purchasing organic products, the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) is concentrating on eliminating food and beverages improperly labeled as organic.  The USDA National Organic Program (“NOP”) published its final rule entitled “Strengthening Organic Enforcement (“SOE”).  This rule will be implemented as of […]


The New York City Department of Transportation has published final rules regarding the open restaurant program.  Any restaurant that erected an outside dining structure or engaged in outdoor dining on a public road or street pursuant to prior rules must apply for revocable consent under the new regulations within five months of the new rules […]

N.Y. Beer Franchise Rights and Improper Termination

Many states, including New York, have alcoholic-beverage franchise laws. These laws are intended to promote stability and fairness among suppliers and wholesalers.

Ready to get started?

Attorney Advertising: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.
The Danow Group PLLC is the successor to Danow, McMullan & Panoff, P.C.
The Danow Group PLLC is a professional limited liability company formed under the laws of the state of New York.
© 2024 All Rights Reserved, The Danow Group, PLLC
web design in new york